Tom Paris vs Tiago Pires Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L L W L
Form
L W L L L L L LH2H: Paris 1 - 0 Pires
They have played 2 sets in total, with Paris winning 2 and Pires winning 0. The last match between Paris and Pires was at the M25 Bourg-en-Bresse, 29-06-2023, Second, Clay with Tom Paris getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tom Paris | 1 |
| Tiago Pires | 0 |
M25 Bourg-en-Bresse(29-06-2023)
6
3
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Michelsen VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Tom Paris
Player
Tiago Pires
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:33:0 | Average Match Time | 1:33:0 |
| 69% (38/55) | 1st Serve % | 60% (30/50) |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 46% (23/50) | Return Points Win % | 31% (17/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tom Paris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Tom Paris
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Maxime Cressy
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Tom Paris
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tom Paris
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Tom Paris
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Elijah Strode
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Isaiah Strode
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Tom Paris
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Tom Paris
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tiago Pires Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Lynch
Player
Tiago Pires
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(4) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Tiago Pires
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Tiago Pires
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Tiago Pires
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kobelt
Player
Tiago Pires
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Tiago Pires
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Pires
Player
David Pichler
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (82/51) | Win/Loss | 13% (1/7) |
| 60% (181/122) | Sets Win/Loss | 13% (2/14) |
| 53% (1563/1366) | Games Win/Loss | 38% (55/89) |
| 60% (24/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (12/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) |
| 64% (46/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 690 | Aces Total | 17 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.67 |
| 323 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
| 1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:40:52 |
| 386.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 536.63 |
| 60% (4631/7701) | 1st Serve % | 56% (270/484) |
| 74% (3421/4631) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (167/270) |
| 52% (1604/3070) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (92/214) |
| 43% (288/673) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (15/37) |
| 38% (2906/7684) | Return Points Win % | 35% (158/447) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/13) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (70/37) | Futures W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 62% (81/131) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 13% (1/8) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (24/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (20/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 86% (86/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 14% (86/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 17% (47/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
